top of page
Search

Star Signs: Just Another Fad?

  • Melanie Jennings
  • Nov 3, 2016
  • 1 min read

Although birthdays are special for almost everyone, we all have to accept the fact that a while ago our parents perhaps smoked a little too much weed or didn’t realize the percent of the alcohol content on whatever they were drinking when they still got smashed in public and lo behold they banged and here we are now. Happy Birthday to you!

The day of your birth is significant for a variety of reasons. The day you were born marks the decline of your parents’ bank account, a contribution to the overpopulation of public schools, and another reason for Baby Gap to open ANOTHER store- don’t get me wrong, though, there is nothing wrong with that last part because who can resist baby Sperry’s? Besides those fundamental facts, one of the most notable events of your birth is the astrological sign you receive.

Like many of us though, there is an “accident” in the astrological system. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which is fancy way of saying NASA, finally decided to tell us that there is actually a thirteenth sign. According to NASA, there were always thirteen signs, but the Babylonians removed the new one, Ophiuchus, from the rest of the original twelve signs and dates because, at the time, the world was already operating on a twelve month calendar. You can only imagine my fury upon discovering this, after getting a tattoo two weeks ago of the constellation of my supposed astrological sign, Gemini. Thanks, NASA. I hope I make it to the moon one day to permanently place a fat “NO” so we’re even.

 
 
 

Comments


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

Hipster Quote of the Week:

The message at the end of “The Tortoise and the Hare” isn’t that ‘slow and steady wins the race’, but actually a well-remembered quote from the 1977 Disney classic “A New Hope”: “Great kid! Don’t get cocky”. Bullshit that the hare was gonna lose that race if he didn’t choose to stop for a nap and a snack and whatever else he did. Bullshit that the tortoise was going to catch up in any capacity if the hare didn’t slow down for him. Maybe that platitude makes sense, but definitely not in this situation.

 

A race is a sheer contest of speed. No other skills go into that. The tortoise and the hare aren’t making miniature wooden horses and getting judged on the craftsmanship of their products alongside their finish time; they are moving from one point to another. In no universe does slow and steady win that race. Slow and steady wins no races, except for races where the point is to go as slow as possible. Even in cases where slow and steady could be considered a possible alternative to fast, such as the aforementioned miniature-wooden-horse-making competition, someone who can do similar quality work at a much faster pace still wins that competition.

 

Slow and steady does not win the race. Not being too full of yourself does.."

 

~Nick Gilfor

bottom of page